1) NATO fails to deliver half of trainers promised for Afghanistan
…
A further complication is that some contributing countries, including Canada, have placed restrictions on how and where their trainers can be used in Afghanistan.The pledge of Canadian trainers last month came with the caveat that they not be used outside the Kabul area or “outside the wire,” such as in mentoring roles that would put them in the field with Afghan soldiers or police officers.
Although the makeup of the Canadian training force has yet to be announced [the US has been pressing us], the limitation sets a domino effect into motion. To find places for them, NATO commanders will likely have to move trainers from other countries out of bases and schools in the Afghan capital…
Lots more on that wee difficulty from BruceR. at Flit.
2) Foreign troop deaths in Afghanistan top 700 in 2010: site
…
The latest figures came as The New York Times reported that senior US military commanders in Afghanistan are pushing to expand special operations ground raids across the border in Pakistan’s lawless tribal areas.But the story was denied by a spokesman for ISAF, who said there was “absolutely no truth” to any suggestion that ground operations into Pakistan were planned.
3) U.S. Military Seeks to Expand Raids in Pakistan
WASHINGTON — Senior American military commanders in Afghanistan are pushing for an expanded campaign of Special Operations ground raids across the border into Pakistan’s tribal areas, a risky strategy reflecting the growing frustration with Pakistan’s efforts to root out militants there.
The proposal, described by American officials in Washington and Afghanistan, would escalate military activities inside Pakistan, where the movement of American forces has been largely prohibited because of fears of provoking a backlash.
The plan has not yet been approved, but military and political leaders say a renewed sense of urgency has taken hold, as the deadline approaches for the Obama administration to begin withdrawing its forces from Afghanistan. Even with the risks, military commanders say that using American Special Operations troops could bring an intelligence windfall, if militants were captured, brought back across the border into Afghanistan and interrogated…
…one senior American officer said, “We’ve never been as close as we are now to getting the go-ahead to go across.”..
Update: From Terry Glavin:
…
…
All I’m saying here is that nothing cheers me up more than the sight of an unveiled Afghan woman cradling a machine gun [actually an AK assault rifle variant].
Mark
Ottawa



Maybe that would be the solution in Afghanistan: Arm all the women and give them a licence to kill any jerk showing up with a jar of acid or a knife to cut theirr noses off ! Sort of joking but if one thinks about it the reason the men can oppress the women is that they are physically stronger i.e. the gun is the great equalizer.
Educate the woman and arm them and give them the vote: If they currently have the vote they probably are scared of voting in a way that their menfolk would disapprove of !