6

Breaking: Holy Afghan mackerel!!! When the PM flips, he flips large

Wow!  Assuming this CBC story is close to the truth; earlier estimates had been 400-600 CF personnel:

Extended Afghan mission to involve 1,000 troops

Canada would keep as many as 1,000 troops in Kabul as part of a plan to extend the country’s mission in Afghanistan and convert it into a non-combat role after 2011, CBC News has learned.

Up to 750 trainers and at least 200 support staff would work outside the combat zone at a training academy or large training facility for Afghan soldiers and police officers, the CBC’s James Cudmore reports. They would remain in Afghanistan until 2014 at the latest.

This is the first time specific numbers related to the proposed mission extension have been made public…

I just hope the story, which looks to me more like a true leak than a government trial balloon, does not cause the prime minister to re-think the numbers, which certainly will get a lot a criticism: e.g., they will make it harder to take a significant part in those blessed UN peacekeeping missions.

But our allies will be especially pleased; and the Dutch may get serious encouragement to come  back to Afstan in a similar role.

Earlier today:

The world does need more Canada–in Afstan/State of the battle/Danish note

Update thought: I suspect the arrangement, given the large number of CF personnel, will be that Canada effectively takes over the NATO Training Mission – Afghanistan in Kabul–which will be great relief for the alliance. The NATO mission works alongside the separate (sort of) US Combined Security Transition Command – Afghanistan and has the same commander.

Mark
Ottawa

6 Responses so far.

  1. FayNo Gravatar says:

    Are you in agreement Mark with this decision? Sometimes i have a hard time following your message.

  2. Alberta BobNo Gravatar says:

    Our soldiers have rotated through there so many times that there are no fresh soldiers left to send. Our people are burnt out.

  3. MarkOttawaNo Gravatar says:

    Indeed I am. Canadian politics and public opinion would not allow any further combat mission (it seems to me that most Conservatives now want to bail from the country completely for political reasons, with some thinking that Muslims are incorrigible and just not worth it; you should have heard the callers to Lowell Green on CFRA Ottawa this morning).

    And I do not think the over-stretched Army could continue on the current mission.

    All in all a good compromise that should gain us serious alliance credit, see this subsequent post
    http://unambig.com/now-is-the-time-at-ua-when-we-juxtapose-cf-trainers-for-afstan-and-nato-requirements/

    and more importantly give real help to the Afghans.

    Mark
    Ottawa

  4. [...] Why CF trainers at Kabul would be a very Good Thing: … Total ANSF growth, starting from November 2009 to present [...]

  5. [...] Harper did not offer specifics about numbers of troops [more here]… [...]