Harper Is Not “Starving” Health Care

Posted February 25th, 2011 in Canada by Adrian MacNair

You might have seen this little blurb in the Toronto Star about Tommy Douglas’s daughter claiming that Stephen Harper is eroding the health care system. She reportedly said that while Harper would never admit he’s against the system, the evidence shows that the system is “being starved to death.”

First of all, let’s get some facts straight on this story. Total spending on health care in Canada reached roughly $191.6 billion in 2010, up by $9.5 billion (5.2 per cent) from 2009, according the Canadian Institute for Health Information. This represented a year-over-year increase of $216 per Canadian, bringing total health expenditure per capita to an estimated $5,614. As recently as 2008, Canada was fifth in the OECD for health care spending per capita.

When Tommy Douglas’s vision of Medicare was brought into being in 1962 by Woodrow Lloyd, the federal government offered a plan to fund 50 per cent of hospital costs. By 1966 that became a 50-50 arrangement between the federal government and the provinces. Since that time, and most notably during the Liberal majority governments during the 90s, health care transfer payments has dropped to about 16 per cent.

Spending as a per cent of GDP increased most between 1975 and 1992, rising from seven to 10 per cent in that time. Liberal cutbacks and changes to provincial transfer payments, particularly with the creation of the confusing Canada Health and Social Transfer system in 1996, resulted in a decline in spending.

Put into historical perspective, Pierre Trudeau’s Liberal government in 1975 spent $12.2 billion on health care, or roughly $527 per person. In Brian Mulroney’s second year in office that number had increased to $49.8 billion ($1,541.70). At the Liberal handover of power in 2005, total health care spending was $140 billion ($4,333.30). So in just four years the Harper government has increased year-over-year spending by $10.32 billion, or an additional $1,280.70 for every man, woman and child in Canada.

I’m far from one to defend Stephen Harper’s spending habits, but it would seem to me that 27 per cent increase to the total health care spending in Canada over five years is a rather significant improvement, and far from being “starved to death.” Starving the system would have been to increase spending by a nominal increase in the inflationary adjustments.

Let’s not forget that the Canada Health Act is very clear in keeping health care a provincial jurisdiction. How the provinces manage their money is entirely up to the financial responsibility of the provincial leadership at the time. In 2007, the largest cost of health care spending was in hospital costs, eating 28.6 per cent of the whole; physician salaries took up 13.1 per cent; and prescription drugs accounted for 16.5 per cent.

According to the 2010 federal budget, $24.8 billion went to the provinces in the form of health transfer payments, second only to social security. An additional $2.9 billion was transferred in provincial program expenses. (It might be worthy to note that Canada spent $20.9 billion on national defence).

Health care spending accounts for between 37 per cent to 50 per cent of provincial budgets now, and that number continues to rise as the provinces depend on larger transfer payments from Ottawa. The logical solution, then, would be to amend the Canada Health Act to allow for a more flexible delivery of health care at the provincial level and remove the dependence on the federal government to control the problem.

Publius: “…it’s socialized health care, with Saskatchewanian characteristics.”

Posted October 26th, 2010 in Canada by MarkOttawa

Lovely, Brian Mulroney starting to see the light:

http://godscopybook.blogs.com/.a/6a00d83452553069e200e54ff19a988833-150wi

A Sacred Trust Revisited

Earlier:

Tommy Douglas not rolling in his grave enough/Ministers of cults [me]

The Writing On The Hospital Wall [Adrian]

Mark
Ottawa

Minimum Max “going roque?”

Posted October 14th, 2010 in Canada by MarkOttawa

Earlier:

Minimum Max a conservative leader?

Note that small “c”; let the provinces be provinces, let the feds be feds, and let the voters know who is truly responsible for what–so they can at least have the opportunity to decide intelligently. Now from Paul at Celestial Junk:

More Max … floating trial balloons for the boss … or going roque?

Maverick Max went rogue again in a Toronto speech on Wednesday by advocating Ottawa get out of transfer payments to provinces while giving legislatures more tax room to finance the health, social welfare and education services they are constitutionally obliged to deliver.

For Jim Flaherty, who rolled out a blueprint on Tuesday showing continued growth in the social transfer envelope well into the next government’s mandate, the notion of surrendering $40 billion worth of fiscal clout over the provinces is a severely alien concept.

… and who can forget this … or this.

And this is a very good piece:

Stop giving $36B a year to the provinces

Plus a news story, note the implicit opening towards private health care (see: “Tommy Douglas not rolling in his grave enough/Ministers of cults”):

Tory MP suggests scrapping Canada Health Transfer

http://www.vancouversun.com/news/2318264.bin
Conservative MP Maxime Bernier (pictured) on Wednesday proposed scrapping the Canada Health Transfer and giving the provinces dramatically more flexibility in how they deliver services — ideas quickly condemned by critics as a possible trial balloon revealing Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s “real vision” for health care.
Photograph by: Francis Vachon, Postmedia News

If only.

Update thought: Even if these transfers were cut equalization payments would remain:

…the Government of Canada’s transfer program for addressing fiscal disparities among provinces. Equalization payments enable less prosperous provincial governments to provide their residents with public services that are reasonably comparable to those in other provinces, at reasonably comparable levels of taxation…

So M. Bernier’s transfer of taxation take from the feds to the provinces should not affect the latter’s inherent abilitily to provide services.

Mark
Ottawa

Tommy Douglas not rolling in his grave enough/Ministers of cults

Posted September 3rd, 2010 in Canada by MarkOttawa

Further to the mild tone of optimism in a recent post of mine (with a major reservation), Publius looks to Alberta and describes a dark side:

http://godscopybook.blogs.com/.a/6a00d83452553069e200e54ff19a988833-150wi

This is not talk of freeing the market for health care – perish the radical thought – but allowing private entities to offer care with public funds. The hope is that by contracting out, the services will be delivered more efficiently, while keeping the provincial governments as paymasters. The latter part is suppose to reassure the electorate in some deeply mystical way. Because the government is paying for it, it will be good and humane. Repeat until numb.

Since this is government-run health care by other means, there is little to cheer about. Its main advantage is circumventing the militant health care unions. Its disadvantage is that, in the Left hands, it can be used to discredit further reforms in the direction of the market. Just regulate privately delivered care in such a way as make it even worse than the purely public system, and wait for the Toronto Star – and its sisters across the Dominion – to denounce it as capitalism run amok…

As I’ve often said in this space, Medicare isn’t a government program, it’s a cult…

…Any sort of health care financing scheme will have to rely on the principle of putting a bit in and using as needed, something akin to insurance. The overwhelmingly majority of Canadians can afford private insurance premiums, if they could not the tax base would not exist to support the current system. Like with food and housing, those who could not afford the premiums would be subsidized. Such a system would have its abuses, as any system does, but it will allow the great majority of Canadians access to health care on their own terms, rather than those of the Minister of Health. It would also ensure that even the poor could get quality health care, since they would be just another customer of the hospital or clinic. While such an approach would be logical, it would challenge the sanctity of government delivered care. The Cult of Medicare is not interested in quality health care, it is interested in preserving state health care…

Cult. Quite. We have ministers, not of health but of cults.

Mark
Ottawa

Tommy Douglas rolling in his grave

Posted August 31st, 2010 in Canada by MarkOttawa

A ray of reason in our mindlessly ideological health care “debate”:

Tasha Kheiriddin: Private health care comes to…. Saskatchewan

From the cradle of Medicare, hope for health care reform.   The Saskatchewan government announced this week that it will be contracting out dental and knee surgery to a private surgical facility.  While the public purse will foot the bill, the operations will be performed by the Omni Surgery Centre instead of a public hospital.

According to provincial health minister Don McMorris,

“the move will help shorten wait times for some day surgeries and the setting will be more convenient for patients.”

The move will not only save time, but money.  Surgeries done at the Omni Surgery Centre cost less than the same procedures done at a hospital. According to provincial officials, knee surgeries will cost $1,500, $179 or 11 per cent less per procedure. Dental surgeries, at $965, will be cheaper by $76 or seven per cent…

Will never happen in Ontario under Dauntless Dalton’s union-beholden Liberals (and probably not even under a Progressive Conservative government any time soon).  But allowing the private provision of publicly-funded medical services is only a first step; private funding is also needed. See this post:

Paying for “one-tier” health care, Part 2

Update thought: As for the current federal government’s even touching on the private funding issue…hah!  Even private provision probably beyond their possibilities given their political pusillanimity (despite the hideously dictatorial habits of a certain prime minister). Ain’t alliteration and assonance awesome? Unless overdone, ça va sans dire.

Mark
Ottawa