10

The BC Hangover Budget


Photograph: Darryl Dyck, Canadian Press

The Gordon Campbell budget was released yesterday, but I needed a day to think about the impact of the announcements. Nothing really comes as much of a surprise, and the Liberals put the money into the two areas that they would have been crucified had they ignored: health care and education. But even in those areas there could be some improvement.

In some respects the budget is a restrained stimulus-free version that the federal government doesn’t have the political capital, or the political courage, to release on Thursday. Finance Minister Colin Hansen presented a budget with significant cuts to government workers, and tightened the belt toward a balanced budget, but not until 2013.

Although the targets are for 4,142 fewer government workers by that date, a 13% shrinking of the civil service, this budget is still one with record spending. With the September budget update that put the government in a deficit position of $1.6 billion, the province has been slowly letting go of people in the bureaucracy.

The Liberals had made numerous cuts to spending on the road to the Olympics, but that was to ensure that nothing got in the way of their Games glory. In August the government said it was forced to close 13.5 operating rooms in the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority from September of 2009 until the end of the Olympic Games in order to meet the challenges of their massive budget shortfalls. They postponed 5,800 surgeries in areas such as neurosurgery, vascular surgery, ortho trauma, ophthalmology and general surgery. They also reduced operating-room and hospital-ward staff by an estimated 112 full-time-equivalent jobs. And they cut 13 anesthesiology positions.

The perception of a struggling health care sector and strained education system left the government with no choice but to add spending to those areas. Expenses grew by $460 million since the last budget, including a further $105 million for school districts, $31 million for post-secondary institutions and $34 million for health authorities and hospital societies.

For all of the BC Liberals’ tough talk on no deficits, in which the Campbell government breached their own legislation last February, multiple deficit projections will accrue public debt by 2013 that will reach levels seen under the NDP in the late nineties.

Unfortunately, much of the increased spending in education doesn’t address the root problems that have caused record numbers of school closures in British Columbia and teacher layoffs during the past decade. Instead it’s going to a back-door universal daycare program for full-day kindergarten, and salary increases for teachers to keep the teacher’s unions happy. That means that school administrations will still be struggling with basic needs like transportation costs, increased Medical Services Premiums, and the expected hit from the July 1 HST.

According to Mr.Hansen’s latest forecast, B.C. will sustain deficits of $1.7 billion, $945 million and $145 million in the next three fiscal years, from 2010-11 to 2012-13, before returning to expected surpluses thereafter. That would bring B.C.’s public debt from $36.1 billion in 2001 to $55.9 billion by the end of the budget forecast, an increase of 35.4%. Moreover, that debt burden puts $14,300 per capita on B.C. residents, only $1,300 less than our per capita federal debt.

The other problem with the budget forecast is in repeating the mistakes of the federal government’s own optimistic revenue and growth forecasts. Mr.Hansen expects an annual revenue growth of 4.9%, but there’s little indication that British Columbia will continue to recover from the recession quickly enough to make that growth, or that the HST won’t throw a wrench into those plans. Not only will all HST revenue go into health care [no "stimulus" there], but the increased taxes on medical services premiums will also increase the tax burden on the base. The carbon tax is also slated to go up once again on July 1, the same day the HST will kick in.

And now that the Olympic party’s over, and the Liberal government became the photo-op beneficiaries of a record 14-gold medals performance by our athletes, they’ll be rewarding them by disowning the podium altogether.

10 Responses so far.

  1. Rob ZandeeNo Gravatar says:

    no to nit pick, but you might want to double check that growth projection. as it happend, I was at the leg listening to the speech, and I am pretty sure that he was taking about something in the 2% range. I might be wrong about though.
    cheers

  2. Hi Rob,

    I’m not surprised you disbelieved that number either. But here’s the transcript proof:

    “We expect revenue growth over the next three years to average 4.9 per cent annually. In order to reach a balanced budget, we will limit spending growth to an annual average of 2.3 per cent.”

  3. Rob ZandeeNo Gravatar says:

    lovely, thanks

  4. Rob ZandeeNo Gravatar says:

    My mistake..you were talking revenue growth, I was hearing and thinking GDP growth which was in the 2-3% range. my bad

  5. That’s allright. Yeah, the GDP growth sounds a little more plausible.

  6. cynical joeNo Gravatar says:

    I was confused by the Own the Podium link; it appeared that BC paid 10 million over 5 years, thats only 2 million per year, I think OTP can replace that funding, or they need a new corporate fund raiser.

  7. Joe,

    You’re right. I just find it kind of funny that Gordo and Co all basked in the Olympics glow and then promptly cut off the taps.

  8. cynical joeNo Gravatar says:

    Well, I’m totally in favour of the OTP program, but count me as one of the BC taxpayers happy to see the cut.

    Here’s an interesting link though, the Royal Bank of Canada’s profit (not revenue, but profit) for one quarter (not a full year, just three months) was 1.5 billion. If the OTP program can’t find more than enough funding from the Canadian banking sector, maybe they have to apply some of the lessons learned from the athletes and apply them to fund-raising. Thats where you really need excellence!

  9. JulieNo Gravatar says:

    Would it work to, tax on a graduated, percent system. I am a pensioner, and would love to see, our income tax deducted right off our pensions. There are so many new tax rules, the CRA staff, can’t keep up with them. They, give out wrong advice, and one person I know, that it happened to, it was over five years ago, and she repeatedly asked them for her documents to see if, the mistake could be found, they declined. Then a person hears, there was corruption found, in the CRA. The average citizens taxes could be, deducted, from their payroll. The CRA would only need a few staff, to keep the white collars and big business, honest. Just imagine all the tax dollars that would save. It is also about time, the taxes are made, more fair. Every tax is a percentage, so, I think a graduated % would be fair. We all know, big business, has the money to back the political party, that benefits them the most. The brunt of all taxes, is on the little guy. So, because of the recession, the light at the end of the tunnel, is out. The little guy, has no job, his house is lost, along with his vehicle. He has no savings left. Campbell and Hansen’s frenzy, to find more ways to tax citizens, is no longer viable. There are too many citizens out of work, to pay anything.

  10. Julie,

    The CRA is practically a legalized theft agency. They alone decide what you owe, when you owe it, and what to bill you. I’ve had my child tax credit constantly reassessed, retroactively garnished because of their own incompetence, and denied genuine expenses.

    A flat tax would solve much of the problems that exist in Canada. 1 tax for everyone. No loopholes, exemptions, or fancy footwork.